Indeterminism and pluralism in nature: From science to philosophy and theology

In Ignacio Silva (ed.), Latin American Perspectives on Science and Religion. Londres, Reino Unido: pp. 135-146 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The discussion of determinism/indeterminism in the natural world is not only a concern for epistemology and philosophy of science; it also has strong implications for natural theology. On the one hand, the distinction between determinism and predictability has led to deeper research into the relationship between ontological and gnoseological realms. On the other hand, the multiple descriptions proposed by contemporary science cannot avoid the question of the cognitive status of the various scientific formulations and the possibility of a coexistence of deterministic and indeterministic views. This chapter presents the methodological proposal of the abandonment of the mental limit which entails a deep renunciation of any form of monism and of the kind of uniqueness that results from resting at an objectification. Methodic-thematic pluralism not only relates the gnoseological to the ontological realms without confusing them, but also paves the way for establishing the cognitive status of the different scientific disciplines avoiding reduction.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VANIAP-9
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-10-30
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-10-30

Total views
96 ( #38,883 of 56,050 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #32,094 of 56,050 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.