My body, still my choice: an objection to Hendricks on abortion

Journal of Medical Ethics:jme-2022-108538 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In ‘My body, not my choice: against legalised abortion’, Hendricks offers an intriguing argument that suggests the state can coerce pregnant women into continuing to sustain their fetuses. His argument consists partly in countering Boonin’s defence of legalised abortion, followed by an argument from analogy. I argue in this response article that his argument from analogy fails and, correspondingly, it should still be a woman’s legal choice to have an abortion. My key point concerns the burdensomeness of pregnancy which is morally relevant to the question of whether the state can coerce people to use their bodies to help another person.
Keywords
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VANMBS-4
Upload history
Archival date: 2022-07-31
View other versions
Added to PP index
2022-07-31

Total views
46 ( #64,737 of 71,180 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
46 ( #17,762 of 71,180 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.