On Two Interpretations of the Desire-Satisfaction Theory of Prudential Value

Utilitas 31 (2):137-156 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This article considers two different ways of formulating a desire-satisfaction theory of prudential value. The first version of the theory (the object view) assigns basic prudential value to the state of affairs that is the object of a person’s desire. The second version (the combo view) assigns basic prudential value to the compound state of affairs in which (a) a person desires some state of affairs and (b) this state of affairs obtains. My aims in this article are twofold. First, I aim to highlight that these are not mere notational variants, but in fact have quite different implications, so that this distinction is not one that the theorist of prudential value should ignore. More positively, I argue that the object view is better able to capture what is distinctive and appealing about subjective theories of prudential value, on any plausible account of what the central subjectivist insight is.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VANOTI-5
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-01-29
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-10-05

Total views
177 ( #33,757 of 64,084 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
61 ( #11,937 of 64,084 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.