Perspectives on Scientific Error

Royal Society Open Science 10 (7):230448 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Theoretical arguments and empirical investigations indicate that a high proportion of published findings do not replicate and are likely false. The current position paper provides a broad perspective on scientific error, which may lead to replication failures. This broad perspective focuses on reform history and on opportunities for future reform. We organize our perspective along four main themes: institutional reform, methodological reform, statistical reform and publishing reform. For each theme, we illustrate potential errors by narrating the story of a fictional researcher during the research cycle. We discuss future opportunities for reform. The resulting agenda provides a resource to usher in an era that is marked by a research culture that is less error-prone and a scientific publication landscape with fewer spurious findings.

Author Profiles

Remco Heesen
London School of Economics
Felipe Romero
University of Groningen
Noah van Dongen
University of Turin
2 more


Added to PP

209 (#61,579)

6 months
140 (#18,577)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?