Testimony and grammatical evidentials

In Miranda Fricker, Peter Graham, David Henderson, Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen & Jeremy Wyatt (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology. Routledge. pp. 135-144 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Unlike other sources of evidence like perception and memory, testimony is intimately related to natural language. That intimacy cannot be overlooked. In this chapter, I show how cross-linguistic considerations are relevant to the epistemology of testimony. I make my case with declaratives containing grammaticalized evidentials. My discussion has a negative and a positive part. For the negative part, it is argued that some definitions of testimony are mistaken because they do not apply to testimony offered by a declarative containing an evidential. The positive component discusses a new puzzle noted by McCready (2015) that evidentials raise about the justificatory status of testimony-based beliefs.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VANTAG-6
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-11-22
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-03-21

Total views
369 ( #17,414 of 2,448,218 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #18,806 of 2,448,218 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.