What counts as original appropriation?

Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (4):355-373 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I here defend historical entitlement theories of property rights against a popular charge. This is the objection that such theories fail because no convincing account of original appropriation exists. I argue that this argument assumes a certain reading of historical entitlement theory and I spell out an alternative reading against which it misfires. On this reading, the role of acts of original appropriation is not to justify but to individuate people’s holdings. I argue that we can identify which acts count as original appropriation against the background of a general justification for a practice of property rights. On this view, what I will call ‘natural’ acts of original appropriation are acts by which a person begins to satisfy the general conditions for justified ownership. Finally, I offer an interpretation of John Locke's theory of appropriation along these lines and argue that it provides an attractive reading of his view
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VANWCA
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Are Property Rights Problematic?Gaus, Gerald F. & Lomasky, Loren E.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Property and Business.Van Der Vossen, Bas

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-10-24

Total views
623 ( #4,741 of 44,329 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #24,361 of 44,329 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.