What the metasemantics of "know" is not

Linguistics and Philosophy 43 (1):69-82 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Epistemic contextualism in the style of Lewis (1996) maintains that ascriptions of knowledge to a subject vary in truth with the alternatives that can be eliminated by the subject’s evidence in a context. Schaffer (2004, 2005, 2007, 2008, 2015), Schaffer and Knobe (2012), and Schaffer and Szabo ́ (2014) hold that the question under discussion or QUD always determines these alternatives in a context. This paper shows that the QUD does not perform such a role for "know" and uses this result to draw a few lessons about the metasemantics of context- sensitivity.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VANWTM-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-11-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
Elusive Knowledge.Lewis, David K.

View all 39 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-07-19

Total views
121 ( #30,027 of 49,982 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
51 ( #11,639 of 49,982 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.