Boundaries, continuity, and contact

Noûs 31 (1):26-58 (1997)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
There are conflicting intuitions concerning the status of a boundary separating two adjacent entities (or two parts of the same entity). The boundary cannot belong to both things, for adjacency excludes overlap; and it cannot belong to neither, for nothing lies between two adjacent things. Yet how can the dilemma be avoided without assigning the boundary to one thing or the other at random? Some philosophers regard this as a reductio of the very notion of a boundary, which should accordingly be treated a mere façon de parler. In this paper I resist this temptation and examine some ways of taking the puzzle at face value within a realist perspective—treating boundaries as ontologically on a par with (albeit parasitic upon) extended parts.
Keywords
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VARBCA
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Parts: A Study in Ontology.Peter Simons - 1987 - Oxford University Press.
Parts of Classes.LEWIS, David
Vague Objects.Tye, Michael

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Fiat and Bona Fide Boundaries.Smith, Barry & Varzi, Achille C.
The Niche.Smith, Barry & Varzi, Achille C.
Inconsistent Boundaries.Weber, Zach & Cotnoir, A. J.

View all 25 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
295 ( #12,487 of 44,255 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
73 ( #8,471 of 44,255 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.