Promiscuous Endurantism and Diachronic Vagueness

American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (2):181-189 (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to a popular line of reasoning, diachronic vagueness creates a problem for the endurantist conception of persistence. Some authors have replied that this line of reasoning is inconclusive, since the endurantist can subscribe to a principle of Diachronic Unrestricted Composition (DUC) that is perfectly parallel to the principle required by the perdurantist’s semantic account. I object that the endurantist should better avoid DUC. And I argue that even DUC, if accepted, would fail to provide the endurantist with the necessary resources for explaining diachronic vagueness in familiar semantic terms.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VARPEA
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
287 ( #18,328 of 55,780 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #28,069 of 55,780 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.