Parts, Wholes, and Part-Whole Relations: The Prospects of Mereotopology

Data and Knowledge Engineering 20:259–286 (1996)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
We can see mereology as a theory of parthood and topology as a theory of wholeness. How can these be combined to obtain a unified theory of parts and wholes? This paper examines various non-equivalent ways of pursuing this task, with specific reference to its relevance to spatio-temporal reasoning. In particular, three main strategies are compared: (i) mereology and topology as two independent (though mutually related) chapters; (ii) mereology as a general theory subsuming topology; (iii) topology as a general theory subsuming mereology. Some more speculative strategies and directions for further research are also considered.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Parts of Classes.Lewis, David K.
On Denoting.Russell, Bertrand
Parts of Classes.Potter, Michael

View all 40 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Fiat and Bona Fide Boundaries.Smith, Barry & Varzi, Achille C.
The Niche.Smith, Barry & Varzi, Achille C.

View all 33 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
1,007 ( #2,878 of 48,756 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #23,543 of 48,756 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.