Supervaluationism and Paraconsistency

In Diderik Batens, Chris Mortensen, Graham Priest & Jean Paul Van Bendegem (eds.), Frontiers in Paraconsistent Logic. Research Studies Press. pp. 279–297 (2000)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Since its first appearance in 1966, the notion of a supervaluation has been regarded by many as a powerful tool for dealing with semantic gaps. Only recently, however, applications to semantic gluts have also been considered. In previous work I proposed a general framework exploiting the intrinsic gap/glut duality. Here I also examine an alternative account where gaps and gluts are treated on a par: although they reflect opposite situations, the semantic upshot is the same in both cases--the value of some expressions is not uniquely defined. Other strategies for generalizing supervaluations are considered and some comparative facts are discussed.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
General Semantics.Lewis, David K.
Distinctions Without a Difference.McGee, Vann & McLaughlin, Brian
.Skyrms, Brian

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
On Logical Relativity.Varzi, Achille C.
Sulla relatività logica.Varzi, Achille C.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
216 ( #20,174 of 50,072 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #30,058 of 50,072 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.