The extensionality of parthood and composition

Philosophical Quarterly 58 (230):108-133 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I focus on three mereological principles: the Extensionality of Parthood (EP), the Uniqueness of Composition (UC), and the Extensionality of Composition (EC). These principles are not equivalent. Nonetheless, they are closely related (and often equated) as they all reflect the basic nominalistic dictum, No difference without a difference maker. And each one of them—individually or collectively—has been challenged on philosophical grounds. In the first part I argue that such challenges do not quite threaten EP insofar as they are either self-defeating or unsupported. In the second part I argue that they hardly undermine the tenability of EC and UC as well.

Author's Profile

Achille C. Varzi
Columbia University

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
635 (#21,974)

6 months
81 (#46,857)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?