What Is a Good Domain Description? Evaluating and Revising Action Theories in Dynamic Logic

Dissertation, Université Paul Sabatier (2006)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Traditionally, consistency is the only criterion for the quality of a theory in logic-based approaches to reasoning about actions. This work goes beyond that and contributes to the meta-theory of actions by investigating what other properties a good domain de- scription should satisfy. Having Propositional Dynamic Logic (PDL) as background, we state some meta-theoretical postulates concerning this sore spot. When all pos- tulates are satisfied, we call the action theory modular. We point out the problems that arise when the postulates about modularity are violated, and propose algorith- mic checks that can help the designer of an action theory to overcome them. Besides being easier to understand and more elaboration tolerant in McCarthy’s sense, mod- ular theories have interesting computational properties. Moreover, we also propose a framework for updating domain descriptions and show the importance modularity has in action theory change.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VARWIA
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2011-04-01

Total views
307 ( #16,544 of 54,516 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #35,001 of 54,516 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.