Shapelessness in Context

Noûs 48 (3):573-593 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Many philosophers believe that the extensions of evaluative terms and concepts aren’t unified under non-evaluative similarity relations and that this “shapelessness thesis” (ST) has significant metaethical implications regarding non-cognitivism, ethical naturalism, moral particularism, thick concepts and more. ST is typically offered as an explanation of why evaluative classifications appear to “outrun” classifications specifiable in independently intelligible non-evaluative terms. This paper argues that both ST and the outrunning point used to motivate it can be explained on the basis of more general factors that have nothing in particular to do with being evaluative. If so, there is no reason to expect ST to carry the sorts of metaethical implications that get attributed to it. I also show that my main argument is robust across certain complications that are raised by the context-sensitivity of many evaluative terms but have so far been ignored in discussions of ST and related matters.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VAYSIC
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-05-12
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Themes From Kaplan.Almog, Joseph; Perry, John & Wettstein, Howard (eds.)
Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy.Williams, Bernard Arthur Owen
Thinking How to Live.Gibbard, Allan

View all 52 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-06-15

Total views
311 ( #11,015 of 43,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #19,139 of 43,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.