Perspectival pluralism for animal welfare

European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (1):1-14 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Animal welfare has a long history of disregard. While in recent decades the study of animal welfare has become a scientific discipline of its own, the difficulty of measuring animal welfare can still be vastly underestimated. There are three primary theories, or perspectives, on animal welfare - biological functioning, natural living and affective state. These come with their own diverse methods of measurement, each providing a limited perspective on an aspect of welfare. This paper describes a perspectival pluralist account of animal welfare, in which all three theoretical perspectives and their multiple measures are necessary to understand this complex phenomenon and provide a full picture of animal welfare. This in turn will offer us a better understanding of perspectivism and pluralism itself.

Author Profiles

Walter Veit
University of Bristol
Heather Browning
University of Southampton

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-06

Downloads
87 (#61,371)

6 months
55 (#23,623)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?