Is the Thomistic Doctrine of God as "Ipsum Esse Subsistens" Consistent?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The aims of my paper are to set out Aquinas’s arguments in favour of the thesis of God as Subsistent Being itself; set out the arguments against; and propose a fresh reading of that thesis that takes into account both Thomistic doctrine and the criticisms of it. In this way, I shall proceed as in a medieval quaestio, with arguments in favour, sed contra and respondeo.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VENITT-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-04-11
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-12-19

Total views
16 ( #36,934 of 38,937 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #23,752 of 38,937 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.