Medicine, Logic, or Metaphysics? Aristotelianism and Scholasticism in the Fight Book Corpus

Acta Periodica Duellatorum 11 (1):91-127 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Because we tend to study fight books in isolation, we often forget how difficult it is to understand the precise place they occupy in the sociocultural and historical fabric of their time, and spill the many clues they inevitably contain on their owner, their local society, their precise purpose. In order to unlock that information, we need to study them in their broader sociocultural and historical context. This requires a background and research skills that are not always easily accessible to everyone. To illustrate the point, in this paper I show in some detail what is required to make sense of the claim that Aristotelian philosophy and science influenced the medieval fight books in relevant ways, and that understanding this influence helps us to better understand the fight books per se. I give an outline of the general historical framework, and apply it to a testcase: Talhoffer’s Thott 290 2° Ms., with some interesting results. My hope is that this framework may be of some use to other researchers in HEMA Studies who want to dig deeper in sources of interest to them.

Author's Profile

Karin Verelst
Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-06

Downloads
304 (#71,547)

6 months
85 (#65,681)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?