Multi‐track dispositions

Philosophical Quarterly 63 (251):330-352 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It is a familiar point that many ordinary dispositions are multi-track, that is, not fully and adequately characterisable by a single conditional. In this paper, I argue that both the extent and the implications of this point have been severely underestimated. First, I provide new arguments to show that every disposition whose stimulus condition is a determinable quantity must be infinitely multi-track. Secondly, I argue that this result should incline us to move away from the standard assumption that dispositions are in some way importantly linked to conditionals, as presupposed by the debate about various versions of the ‘conditional analysis’ of dispositions. I introduce an alternative conception of dispositionality, which is motivated by linguistic observations about dispositional adjectives and links dispositions to possibility instead of conditionals. I argue that, because of the multi-track nature of dispositions, the possibility-based conception of dispositions is to be preferred.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VETMD
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-03-10
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-03-20

Total views
397 ( #6,193 of 38,058 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
125 ( #2,622 of 38,058 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.