Semantic underdetermination and the cognitive uses of language

Mind and Language 20 (5):537–558 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to the thesis of semantic underdetermination, most sentences of a natural language lack a definite semantic interpretation. This thesis supports an argument against the use of natural language as an instrument of thought, based on the premise that cognition requires a semantically precise and compositional instrument. In this paper we examine several ways to construe this argument, as well as possible ways out for the cognitive view of natural language in the introspectivist version defended by Carruthers. Finally, we sketch a view of the role of language in thought as a specialized tool, showing how it avoids the consequences of semantic underdetermination.

Author Profiles

Agustin Vicente
University of the Basque Country
Fernando Martinez-Manrique
Universidad de Granada

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
941 (#12,488)

6 months
100 (#34,746)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?