Semantic underdetermination and the cognitive uses of language

Mind and Language 20 (5):537–558 (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to the thesis of semantic underdetermination, most sentences of a natural language lack a definite semantic interpretation. This thesis supports an argument against the use of natural language as an instrument of thought, based on the premise that cognition requires a semantically precise and compositional instrument. In this paper we examine several ways to construe this argument, as well as possible ways out for the cognitive view of natural language in the introspectivist version defended by Carruthers. Finally, we sketch a view of the role of language in thought as a specialized tool, showing how it avoids the consequences of semantic underdetermination.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VICSUA
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Consciousness Explained.DENNETT, Daniel C.
Relevance, Communication and Cognition.Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre

View all 42 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Inner Speech: Nature and Functions.Vicente, Agustin & Martinez Manrique, Fernando
The Influence of Language in Conceptualization: Three Views.Vicente, Agustin & Martinez-Manrique, Fernando
Thought, Language, and the Argument From Explicitness.Vicente, Agustín & Martínez-Manrique, Fernando

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
352 ( #8,518 of 40,618 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
58 ( #9,420 of 40,618 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.