Moral Judgments and Motivation: Making Sense of Mixed Intuitions

Ethical Perspectives 23 (2):209-230 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The debate between motivational judgment internalism and motivational judgment externalism focuses on whether a moral judgment is sufficient for motivation, or if an additional conative state is required. It is clear from the literature that internalists and exernalists have different intuitions regarding moral judgments. Most individuals, however, seem to hold a mix of internalist and externalist intuitions. My aim in this paper is to offer an approach to the issue that can account for this mix of intuitions. Drawing on the work of psychologist Augusto Blasi, I suggest that a shift in focus from conative states to moral identity may be worthwhile. I argue that Blasi’s ‘self model’ can provide a straightforward story about moral judgments and motivation that makes sense of our mix of intuitions while accounting for many of the longstanding concerns of the debate between internalism and externalism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-07-24
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Moral Problem.Lenman, James

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
59 ( #38,233 of 47,417 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #27,953 of 47,417 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.