Negotiating “women”: metalinguistic negotiations across languages

Synthese 200 (4):1-20 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The metalinguistic approach to conceptual engineering construes disputes between linguistic reformers and linguistic conservatives as metalinguistic disagreements on how best to use particular expressions. As the present paper argues, this approach has various merits. However, it was recently criticised in Cappelen’s seminal Fixing Language. Cappelen raises an important objection against the metalinguistic picture. According to this objection – the Babel objection, as I shall call it – the metalinguistic account cannot accommodate the intuition of disagreement between linguistic conservatives and reformers who are speaking different languages. The objection generalises to metalinguistic approaches to e.g. moral disagreements. This paper discusses the Babel objection and shows how to dispel it.

Author's Profile

Viktoria Knoll
Technische Universität Dresden

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-08

Downloads
115 (#52,728)

6 months
115 (#5,344)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?