La misoginia in atto nel discorso giuridico: victim blaming e riduzione al silenzio

Versus 1 (Linguaggio, violenza e pratiche):pp. 221-240 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Shedding light on the political power and oppressive potential of language, theories of illocutionary silencing and discursive injustice show how gender, class and race can shape the pragmatics of speech, limiting in some circumstances the speaker’s ability to do things with her words. This article takes a close look at discursive injustice in trials for gender-based violence in connection with the phenomenon of misogyny. It argues that in the courtroom the testimony of the complainant is sometimes silenced by a sexist ideology used in service of misogynistic ends. In particular, it argues that sexist social meanings can sometimes be enacted by the judge and accommodated by prosecutors, figuring as a component of the score in the language game of the trial and thus 1) determining what counts as sexual violence and 2) preventing complainants from making the moves they intend to make.

Author's Profile

Eleonora Volta
University Vita-Salute San Raffaele

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-05-14

Downloads
9 (#94,341)

6 months
9 (#93,319)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?