Overcoming Deadlock: Scientific and Ethical Reasons to Accept the Extended Mind Thesis

Philosophy and Society 29 (4):489-504 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The extended mind thesis maintains that while minds may be centrally located in one’s brain-and-body, they are sometimes partly constituted by tools in our environment. Critics argue that we have no reason to move from the claim that cognition is embedded in the environment to the stronger claim that cognition can be constituted by the environment. I will argue that there are normative reasons, both scientific and ethical, for preferring the extended account of the mind to the rival embedded account.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VOLODS
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-01-19
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-12-09

Total views
131 ( #32,093 of 54,556 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #20,145 of 54,556 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.