Overcoming Deadlock: Scientific and Ethical Reasons to Accept the Extended Mind Thesis

Philosophy and Society 29 (4):489-504 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The extended mind thesis maintains that while minds may be centrally located in one’s brain-and-body, they are sometimes partly constituted by tools in our environment. Critics argue that we have no reason to move from the claim that cognition is embedded in the environment to the stronger claim that cognition can be constituted by the environment. I will argue that there are normative reasons, both scientific and ethical, for preferring the extended account of the mind to the rival embedded account.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VOLODS
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-01-19
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-12-09

Total views
20 ( #35,986 of 39,000 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #20,524 of 39,000 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.