Overcoming Deadlock: Scientific and Ethical Reasons to Accept the Extended Mind Thesis

Philosophy and Society 29 (4):489-504 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The extended mind thesis maintains that while minds may be centrally located in one’s brain-and-body, they are sometimes partly constituted by tools in our environment. Critics argue that we have no reason to move from the claim that cognition is embedded in the environment to the stronger claim that cognition can be constituted by the environment. I will argue that there are normative reasons, both scientific and ethical, for preferring the extended account of the mind to the rival embedded account.

Author's Profile

Karina Vold
University of Toronto, St. George Campus


Added to PP

245 (#49,440)

6 months
36 (#74,687)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?