Defending design arguments against Plantinga

Philosophia Reformata 79 (1):54-65 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article criticises Alvin Plantinga’s claim that ‘basic’ design beliefs, which arise without a conscious inference, have more positive epistemic status than non-basic ones and that we cannot evaluate the probabilities involved in inferential, inductive design arguments.

Author's Profile

Daniel von Wachter
International Academy of Philosophy In The Principality of Liechtenstein


Added to PP

218 (#53,358)

6 months
84 (#28,112)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?