Shareholder Ownership is Irrelevant for Shareholder Primacy

Business Ethics Journal Review 8 (4):20-26 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Strudler rejects shareholder primacy and argues that, once contractual obligations have been fulfilled and shareholders have received a reasonable return on investment, corporate executives may use corporate wealth for the general good. He seeks to establish this claim via an argument that, contrary to the received view, shareholders do not own corporations. After raising some questions about the latter argument, this commentary goes on to argue that the question of corporate ownership is a red herring. The argument for shareholder primacy that Strudler wants to reject does not rely on the premise that shareholders own the firm.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-08-04
Latest version: 2 (2020-08-26)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
42 ( #65,712 of 71,165 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #62,956 of 71,165 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.