Balancing small against large burdens

Behavioural Public Policy 2 (1):125-142 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Common principles for resource allocation in health care can prioritize the alleviation of small health burdens over lifesaving treatment. I argue that there is some evidence that these principles are at odds with a sizable share of public opinion, which holds that saving a life should take priority over any number of cures for minor ailments. I propose two possible explanations for this opinion, one debunking and one vindicatory. I also outline how well-designed surveys and moral inquiry could help decide between them. Finally, I consider how priority-setting principles could be adjusted if the view that saving a life always trumps alleviating small burdens were vindicated.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VOOBSA-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-01-22
Latest version: 2 (2018-04-15)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-01-22

Total views
100 ( #21,691 of 38,007 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #26,266 of 38,007 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.