What time travelers may be able to do

Philosophical Studies 150 (1):115 - 121 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Kadri Vihvelin, in "What time travelers cannot do" (Philos Stud 81: 315-330, 1996), argued that "no time traveler can kill the baby who in fact is her younger self, because (V1) "if someone would fail to do something, no matter how hard or how many times she tried, then she cannot do it", and (V2) if a time traveler tried to kill her baby self, she would always fail. Theodore Sider (Philos Stud 110: 115-138, 2002) criticized Vihvelin's argument, and Ira Kiourti (Philos Stud 139: 343-352, 2008) criticized both Vihvelin's argument and Sider's critique. I present a critique of Vihvelin's argument different from both Sider's and Kiourti's critiques: I argue in a novel way that both V1 and V2 are false. Since Vihvelin's argument might be understood as providing a challenge to the possibility of time travel, if my critique succeeds then time travel survives such a challenge unscathed
Keywords
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VRAWTT
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
455 ( #9,924 of 52,866 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #34,604 of 52,866 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.