Against Moral Contingentism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The conventional wisdom in ethics is that pure moral laws are metaphysically necessary. By contrast, Moral Contingentism holds that pure moral laws are metaphysically contingent. This paper raises a normative objection to Moral Contingentism: it is worse equipped than Moral Necessitarianism to account for the normative standing or authority of the pure moral laws to govern the lives of the agents in the worlds where they hold. Since morality is widely taken to have such a standing, failing to account for it would be a significant problem. At minimum, the objection also shows that the debate about the modal status of moral principles isn’t a debate solely within modal metaphysics, but has implications for topics in moral philosophy.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-04-07
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
83 ( #43,303 of 58,376 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
83 ( #7,945 of 58,376 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.