A Simple Escape from Moral Twin Earth

Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 7 (2):109-118 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper offers a simple response to the Moral Twin Earth (MTE) objection to Naturalist Moral Realism (NMR). NMR typically relies on an externalist metasemantics such as a causal theory of reference. The MTE objection is that such a theory predicts that terms like ‘good’ and ‘right’ have a different reference in certain twin communities where it’s intuitively clear that the twins are talking about the same thing when using ‘good’. I argue that Boyd’s causal regulation theory, the original target of the MTE objection, was never vulnerable to this objection. The theory contains an epistemic constraint on reference which implies that either the property that causally regulates uses of ‘good’ isn’t different for the twin communities or, in scenarios where the reference is different, the communities diverge in ways where it’s not intuitively clear that ‘good’ has the same reference for them.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VYRASE
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-04-16
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Moral Realism.Railton, Peter
Normative Reference Magnets.Williams, J. Robert G.
New Wave Moral Realism Meets Moral Twin Earth.Horgan, Terence & Timmons, Mark

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-04-16

Total downloads
193 ( #11,950 of 34,973 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
180 ( #1,385 of 34,973 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.