Normative Commitments in Metanormative Theory

In Jussi Suikkanen & Antti Kauppinen (eds.), Methodology and Moral Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 193-213 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
First-order normative theories concerning what’s right and wrong, good and bad, etc. and metanormative theories concerning the nature of first-order normative thought and talk are widely regarded as independent theoretical enterprises. This paper argues that several debates in metanormative theory involve views that have first-order normative implications, even as the implications in question may not be immediately recognizable as normative. I first make my claim more precise by outlining a general recipe for generating this result. I then apply this recipe to three debates in metaethics: the modal status of basic normative principles, normative vagueness and indeterminacy, and the determination of reference for normative predicates. In each case I argue that certain views on each issue carry first-order normative commitments, in accordance with my recipe.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VYRNCI
Upload history
First archival date: 2018-06-29
Latest version: 2 (2020-07-24)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-06-29

Total views
647 ( #7,008 of 56,105 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
88 ( #7,237 of 56,105 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.