What Kind of Modality Does the Materialist Need for His Supervenience Claim?

In Batthyany & A. A. Elitzur (eds.), Irreducibly Conscious: Selected Papers on Consciousness. Universitã¤Tsverlag C. Winter. pp. 15-32 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Materialists who do not deny the existence of mental phenomena usually claim that the mental supervenes on the physical, i.e. that there cannot be a change in the mental life of a man without there being a change in the man's body. This modal claim is usually understood in terms of logical necessity. I argue that this is a mistake, resulting from assumptions inherited from logical empiricism, and that it should be understood in terms of synthetic necessity.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-02-09

Downloads
253 (#59,396)

6 months
78 (#52,550)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?