A classification system for argumentation schemes

Argument and Computation 6 (3):219-245 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper explains the importance of classifying argumentation schemes, and outlines how schemes are being used in current research in artificial intelligence and computational linguistics on argument mining. It provides a survey of the literature on scheme classification. What are so far generally taken to represent a set of the most widely useful defeasible argumentation schemes are surveyed and explained systematically, including some that are difficult to classify. A new classification system covering these centrally important schemes is built.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WALACS-7
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-04-11
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Annotating Argument Schemes.Visser, Jacky; Lawrence, John; Reed, Chris; Wagemans, Jean & Walton, Douglas

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-05-22

Total views
23 ( #48,461 of 50,250 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #32,653 of 50,250 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.