Are The Statue and The Clay Mutual Parts?

Noûs:23-50 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Are a material object, such as a statue, and its constituting matter, the clay, parts of one another? One wouldn't have thought so, and yet a number of philosophers have argued that they are. I review the arguments for this surprising claim showing how they all fail. I then consider two arguments against the view concluding that there are both pre-theoretical and theoretical considerations for denying that the statue and the clay are mutual parts.
Reprint years
2017, 2019
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WALATS-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-11-08
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-11-08

Total views
471 ( #9,461 of 52,731 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
49 ( #12,219 of 52,731 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.