Morgenbesser's Coin and Counterfactuals with True Components

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt3):365-379 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Is A & C sufficient for the truth of ‘if A were the case, C would be the case’? Jonathan Bennett thinks not, although the counterexample he gives is inconsistent with his own account of counterfactuals. In any case, I argue that anyone who accepts the case of Morgenbesser's coin, as Bennett does, should reject Bennett’s counterexample. Moreover, I show that the principle underlying his counterexample is unmotivated and indeed false. More generally, I argue that Morgenbesser’s coin commits us to the sufficiency of A & C for the truth of the corresponding counterfactual.
Keywords
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WALMCA
Revision history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 2 (2015-11-21)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Counterfactuals.Lewis, David K.

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Conditional Heresies.Cariani, Fabrizio & Goldstein, Simon

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-03-08

Total views
612 ( #6,204 of 50,290 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #17,579 of 50,290 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.