Serial Fiction, the End?

British Journal of Aesthetics 55 (3):323-341 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Andrew McGonigal presents some interesting data concerning truth in serial fictions.1 Such data has been taken by McGonigal, Cameron and Caplan to motivate some form of contextualism or relativism. I argue, however, that many of these approaches are problematic, and that all are under-motivated as the data can be explained in a standard invariantist semantic framework given some independently plausible principles
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
219 ( #26,791 of 2,439,302 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #38,075 of 2,439,302 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.