English Law's Epistemology of Expert Testimony

Journal of Law and Society 33 (4):572-595 (2006)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This article draws upon the epistemology of testimony to analyse recent English case law on expert evidence. It argues that the courts are implicitly committed to an internalist epistemology and an inferentialist view of testimony, and draws a distinction between testimony which is treated as authoritative (where the fact-finder accepts the inferences drawn by the expert without attempting to assess their validity) and that which is treated as merely persuasive.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WARELE
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-03-15

Total views
1,074 ( #4,619 of 65,772 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
55 ( #14,961 of 65,772 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.