Can Representationism Explain how Attention Affects Appearances?

In Adam Pautz & Daniel Stoljar (eds.), Themes from Block. Boston, USA: The MIT Press (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Recent psychological research shows that attention affects appearances. An “attended item looks bigger, faster, earlier, more saturated, stripier.” (Block 2010, p. 41). What is the significance of these findings? Ned Block has argued that they undermine representationism, roughly the view that the phenomenal character of perception is determined by its representational content. My first goal in this paper is to show that Block’s argument has the structure of a Problem of Arbitrary Phenomenal Variation and that it improves on other instances of arguments of the same form along several dimensions (most prominently, these are arguments based on the possibility of spectral inversion). My second goal is to consider responses to Block’s version of the arbitrariness problem. I will show that most of them have serious drawbacks. Overall, the best view is to accept that attention may distort perception, sacrificing veridicality for usability. I end my discussion by showing how to develop that view.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WATCRE
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-05-11
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-05-11

Total views
147 ( #27,260 of 51,339 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #20,107 of 51,339 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.