Kierkegaard on Truth: One or Many?

Mind:fzw010 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper reexamines Kierkegaard's work with respect to the question whether truth is one or many. I argue that his famous distinction between objective and subjective truth is grounded in a unitary conception of truth as such: truth as self-coincidence. By explaining his use in this context of the term ‘redoubling’ [Fordoblelse], I show how Kierkegaard can intelligibly maintain that truth is neither one nor many, neither a simple unity nor a complex multiplicity. I further show how these points shed much-needed light on the relationship between objective and subjective truth, conceived not as different kinds or species of truth but as different ways in which truth manifests itself as a standard of success across different contexts of inquiry.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2017, 2018
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WATKOT-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-11-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Truth as One and Many.Lynch, Michael P.
Self-Knowing Agents.O’Brien, Lucy

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-11-17

Total views
314 ( #10,820 of 42,910 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
61 ( #10,214 of 42,910 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.