Rogue Opposition: Against Raikka's Genuine Opposition Thesis

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Juha Raikka argues against disassociation from collective responsibility based on a premise of logical inconsistency insofar as the conclusion ‘one is not guilty’ does not necessarily follow from the premise that ‘everyone is guilty.’ Raikka builds his case on a fictionalized national, ethnic, or cultural group that participates in human sacrifices for the sake of ‘medical reasons’ or human health. He concedes that this fictionalized group bears an uncanny resemblance to Western society and their proposed collective responsibility for practices ranging from (A) foreign conflicts to (B) Environmental pollution and (C) overconsumption of “third world” foreign natural resources. Arguably, these practices could be parsed as exercises conducive or equal to ‘human sacrifices’. Our discussion here will be all but entirely subsumed by (C).
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-12-11
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
34 ( #55,781 of 2,432,294 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #49,381 of 2,432,294 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.