The problem of Kierkegaard's socrates

Res Philosophica (4):555-579 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
© 2017 Daniel Watts. © 2017 Res Philosophica. This essay re-examines Kierkegaard's view of Socrates. I consider the problem that arises from Kierkegaard's appeal to Socrates as an exemplar for irony. The problem is that he also appears to think that Socrates cannot be represented as an exemplar for irony. Part of the problem is the paradox of self-reference that immediately arises from trying to represent x as unrepresentable. On the solution I propose, Kierkegaard does not hold that Socrates is in no way representable as an exemplar for irony. Rather, he holds that Socrates cannot be represented as an exemplar for irony in a purely disinterested way. I show how, in The Concept of Irony, Kierkegaard makes use of "limiting cases" of representation in order to bring Socrates into view as one who defies purely disinterested representation. I also show how this approach to Socrates connects up with Kierkegaard's more general interest in the problem of ethical exemplarity, where the problem is how ethical exemplars can be given as such-that is, in such a way that purely disinterested contemplation is not the appropriate response to them.
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-07-01
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Blue and Brown Books.Wittgenstein, Ludwig

View all 39 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
93 ( #26,214 of 41,616 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #24,590 of 41,616 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.