Towards a new theory of historical counterfactuals

In Pavel Arazim & Michal Dancak (eds.), Logica Yearbook 2014. College Publications. pp. 293-310 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
We investigate the semantics of historical counterfactuals in indeterministic contexts. We claim that "plain" and "necessitated" counterfactuals differ in meaning. To substantiate this claim, we propose a new semantic treatment of historical counterfactuals in the Branching Time framework. We supplement our semantics with supervaluationist postsemantics, thanks to which we can explain away the intuitions which seem to talk in favor of the identification of "would" with "would necessarily".
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Philosophical Papers.Lewis, David K.
A Theory of Conditionals.Stalnaker, Robert C.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Back to the actual future.Wawer, Jacek & Malpass, Alex

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
190 ( #22,538 of 50,335 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #17,521 of 50,335 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.