Dutch books and infinity

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Peter Walley argues that a vague credal state need not be representable by a set of probability functions that could represent precise credal states, because he believes that the members of the representor set need not be countably additive. I argue that the states he defends are in a way incoherent.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-03-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
54 ( #35,153 of 43,800 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #43,425 of 43,800 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.