Reply to Blackson

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Thomas Blackson argues that interest-relative epistemologies cannot explain the irrationality of certain choices when the agent has three possible options. I argue that his examples only refute a subclass of interest-relative theories. In particular, they are good objections to theories that say that what an agent knows depends on the stakes involved in the gambles that she faces. But they are not good objections to theories that say that what an agent knows depends on the odds involved in the gambles that she faces. Indeed, the latter class of theories does a better job than interest-invariant epistemologies of explaining the phenomena he describes.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WEARTB
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-10-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-07-02

Total views
43 ( #33,495 of 40,637 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #38,308 of 40,637 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.