A Difference that Makes a Difference: Welfare and the Equality of Consideration

Between the Species 13 (10):6 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics, L.W. Sumner defends two significant constraints on one’s theory of welfare: formality and generality. An adequate theory of welfare, claims Sumner, must give a constitutive account of the “good-for” relation. This constitutive account must be sufficiently general that any entity whose status as a welfare subject is uncontroversial falls within its scope. This paper will argue that Sumner’s proposed constraints are particularly significant to utilitarian arguments for the equal moral considerability of non-human animals. In the absence of these constraints, the inconsistency that is alleged to follow from denying moral considerability to non-human animals, while affirming it for humans, fails to obtain. I will focus on Peter Singer’s argument for the equal moral considerability of non-human animals, in order to support the conclusion that questions about the formality and generality of welfare are significant areas of further research for philosophers of animal welfare
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WEBADT
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Animal Liberation.Singer, Peter. (ed.)
Animal Liberation.Puka, Bill & Singer, Peter
Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics.Brower, Bruce & Sumner, L. W.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-09-04

Total views
235 ( #15,362 of 43,944 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
39 ( #18,699 of 43,944 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.