Clark and Shackel on the Two‐Envelope Paradox

Mind 112 (448):685-689 (2003)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Clark and Shackel have recently argued that previous attempts to resolve the two-envelope paradox fail, and that we must look to symmetries of the relevant expected-value calculations for a solution. Clark and Shackel also argue for a novel solution to the peeking case, a variant of the two-envelope scenario in which you are allowed to look in your envelope before deciding whether or not to swap. Whatever the merits of these solutions, they go beyond accepted decision theory, even contradicting it in the peeking case. Thus if we are to take their solutions seriously, we must understand Clark and Shackel to be proposing a revision of standard decision theory. Understood as such, we will argue, their proposal is both implausible and unnecessary.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WEICAS-9
Revision history
Archival date: 2010-09-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
544 ( #3,737 of 37,116 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
46 ( #7,643 of 37,116 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.