Philosophical Concepts, the Ideal of Sublimation, and the “Unpredictability of Human Behaviour”

Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 9 (4):27-37 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Wittgenstein famously criticizes the philosophical practice of analyzing the meaning of words outside their ordinary use in everyday language, whereby often self-made pseudo-problems arise. In order to shed further light on Wittgenstein’s critique, this article makes use of the Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology. First, starting from the remark in Vol. I, §52, his criticism of the philosophical method of selection and generalization is explained in detail. Next, I give a brief outline of Wittgenstein’s own way of philosophizing by reference to a selection of comments concerning the use of psychological words in everyday language, which will also further elucidate his critique. Finally, I enter into the question which significance everyday language according to Wittgenstein has for philosophy.

Author's Profile

Anja Weiberg
University of Vienna

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-20

Downloads
145 (#79,162)

6 months
87 (#49,838)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?