Equal Opportunity and Newcomb’s Problem

Mind 128 (510):429-457 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The 'Why ain'cha rich?' argument for one-boxing in Newcomb's problem allegedly vindicates evidential decision theory and undermines causal decision theory. But there is a good response to the argument on behalf of causal decision theory. I develop this response. Then I pose a new problem and use it to give a new 'Why ain'cha rich?' argument. Unlike the old argument, the new argument targets evidential decision theory. And unlike the old argument, the new argument is sound.

Author's Profile

Ian Wells
Massachusetts Institute of Technology


Added to PP

707 (#15,839)

6 months
133 (#12,528)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?