Individual Style After The End Of Art

Postgraduate Journal of Aesthetics 2 (3):105-115 (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In The Transfiguration of the Commonplace (1981)1 Arthur Danto construes individual style as something “given” that belongs to the artist “essentially” and “inseparably.” By contrast, his theory of the end of art, set forth in After the End of Art (1997) and elsewhere,2 suggests the liberation of artists from any stylistic commitments. How do these two theories go together? Can there be individual styles after the end of art? Examining the compatibility between Danto’s end of art thesis and his essentialist conception of individual style, this paper tries to approach an answer to these questions.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WENISA-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-07-26
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-07-26

Total views
120 ( #43,348 of 65,623 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #44,494 of 65,623 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.