Individual Style After The End Of Art

Postgraduate Journal of Aesthetics 2 (3):105-115 (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In The Transfiguration of the Commonplace (1981)1 Arthur Danto construes individual style as something “given” that belongs to the artist “essentially” and “inseparably.” By contrast, his theory of the end of art, set forth in After the End of Art (1997) and elsewhere,2 suggests the liberation of artists from any stylistic commitments. How do these two theories go together? Can there be individual styles after the end of art? Examining the compatibility between Danto’s end of art thesis and his essentialist conception of individual style, this paper tries to approach an answer to these questions.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WENISA-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-07-26
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-07-26

Total views
13 ( #43,706 of 43,752 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #37,301 of 43,752 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.