Revising global theories of justice to include public goods

Journal of Global Ethics 9 (2):227 - 243 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Our aim in this paper is to suggest that most current theories of global justice fail to adequately recognise the importance of global public goods. Broadly speaking, this failing can be attributed at least in part to the complexity of the global context, the individualistic focus of most theories of justice, and the localised nature of the theoretical foundations of most theories of global justice. We argue ? using examples (particularly that of protecting antibiotic efficacy) ? that any truly effective theory of global justice must recognise the importance of global public goods. Global public goods confer significant benefits to individuals yet can only be effectively promoted and preserved through collective action and the restriction of individual choice; something which most theories of justice are structurally unequipped to sufficiently promote

Author Profiles

Peter G. N. West-Oram
Brighton and Sussex Medical School
Heather Widdows
University of Birmingham

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-18

Downloads
503 (#35,333)

6 months
132 (#31,250)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?