Assessing Ideal Theories: Lessons from the Theory of Second Best

Politics, Philosophy, and Economics 15 (2):132-149 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Numerous philosophers allege that the "general theory of second best" (Lipsey and Lancaster, 1956) poses a challenge to the Target View, which asserts that real world reform efforts should aim to establish arrangements that satisfy the constitutive features of ideal just states of affairs. I demonstrate two claims that are relevant in this context. First, I show that the theory of second best fails to present a compelling challenge to the Target View in general. But, second, the theory of second best requires ideal theorists to undertake certain kinds of causal and comparative analyses that are typically thought to lie beyond the borders of conventional ideal theory.
Reprint years
2016
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
WIEATT
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 4 (2015-11-21)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2012-11-21

Total views
951 ( #5,263 of 64,146 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
33 ( #22,623 of 64,146 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.